Explain the true-justified-belief theory of knowledge we discussed in Essay

Explain the true-justified-belief theory of fellowship we discussed in class.Then make up your own Gettier graphic symbol and explain why i - Essay ExampleHowever, despite the acceptance of the JTB theory, in that respect is so much consideration to be done around the epistemology of knowledge development. For that reason, a theory of vindication is required, which will lead to answers from the question that the subject (S) is justified in leting the belief that the proposition (p) is factual. Therefore, warrants to be treated equal knowledge if a theory of justification supports the belief. Discussion The conditions required for the true justified belief theory are based on the regard that there should be the subject (S) that holds the proposition in question. The first condition for the theory is that there should be a proposition, which should warrant the subjects treatment that it is factual and one warranting to be regarded as truthful. The second condition for the theor y is that the subject (S) should be one who believes that the proposition in question is truthful (Pritchard, Millar & Haddock 22). The thirdly condition is that the subject (S) should be one who asshole offer a justification or one who identifies with a justification that supports their belief in the verity of the proposition in question (p). ... e second condition is necessary and sufficient, mainly because the subject (S) should hold the belief that the proposition (p) is truthful, because in the case that they do non, then it would not be considered for its truthfulness or the lack thereof (Schaffer 73-75). The third condition is necessary and sufficient, mainly because it is necessary for the subject (S) to be in a position of offering a justification that their belief in the proposition is truthful and one that holds the potential of presenting truthfulness. The three conditions are sufficient when taken into account together, mainly because they cannot work singly, but r equire one another, before they can lead to the development of valid conclusions. For example, taking a case of a false proposition, then the subject is less likely to believe that it is truthful, and more is that they cannot offer a justification of the proposition. Secondly, in a case where the subject does not believe in the proposition, then they are less likely to consider it truthful, and more importantly they cannot offer a justification for believing the proposition. Thirdly, without a justification about the belief in the proposition, it will be impossible for the subject to believe that the proposal is truthful, and more importantly, they will not be able to hold the belief that the proposition is truthful. In offering a counterexample to the truthfulness of JTB, the case of John will be used. From my class, I saw the ID of John, and it shows that he is from Florida therefore, I can infer that he comes from Florida ( proof 1). The second inference will be that, due to the fact that he is from Florida, then a member of the class comes from Florida (inference 2). In this case, inference 2 has been drawn from the justification